# Audit question and approved scope

Can the evidence preserved for STRUST v1 substantiate its historical accuracy,
feasibility, or production-readiness claims? If not, what does the surviving
artifact actually support, and what evidence would a valid follow-up require?

Scope was explicitly approved by the user on 2026-08-03: revise only
`research/project-studies/strust-v1`, preserve real project facts, strengthen
negative and small-sample conclusions, make every number traceable, rebuild and
visually inspect the PDF, and classify the item as Project, Research, or exclude.
No installations, downloads, deployment, commit, or push are authorized in this
lane.

## Second-cycle subquestion

- Which historical claim classes are auditable from the recovered artifact package?
- Which artifacts in the locally declared conjunctive requirement set are missing for each blocked modeled claim?
- Does recovering any single missing artifact complete a blocked claim?
